Mccutcheon and the other plaintiffs sued the federal election commission, arguing that. Supreme court will render a decision in mccutcheon v. Shaun mccutcheon is a businessman and electrical engineer from suburban birmingham, alabama. Supreme court on january 21, 2010, ruled that laws preventing corporations and unions from using general treasury funds for independent political advertising violated the first amendments guarantee of freedom of speech. And while reformists may not like it, the high court is likely to allow national parties to. Introduction on april 2, 2014, the united states supreme court issued the opinion in mccutcheon v. Fec with the high courts opinion in mccutcheon, declaring that the biennial aggregate limit on an individuals contributions to federal candidates and their authorized committees is unconstitutional in october 2012, the district court dismissed virginia james suit. United states court of appeals for the ninth circuit david thompson, et al. Mccutcheons attorneys argued that campaign contributions are a form of free speech. That decision focused, not on the statutes unfavorable treatment of businesses relative to unions and nonprofits, but on whether the ban on. Federal register aggregate biennial contribution limits. The bipartisan campaign reform act of 2002 bcra, which amended the federal election campaign act of 1971 feca, the communications act of 1934, and other portions of the united states code, is the most recent of nearly a century of federal enactments designed to purge national politics of what is conceived to be the pernicious influence of big money campaign contributions. Fec is just the latest in a long line of cases in which the. On january 15, 2015, the brennan center submitted a comment to the federal election commission urging the commission to fix disclosure and coordination rules, and to enforce the law.
Fec that struck down the fecs limit on how much an individual may contribute during a twoyear election cycle. Fecs robust effect on federal and state contractor contribution regulations tyler c. The time to file the joint appendix and appellants brief on the merits is extended to and including may 6, 20. See infra part v examining the future effects of the mccutcheon decision. Mccutcheon case could have big impact on national parties reprinted from anytime now, the u. He wished to donate more in amounts that would be permissible under the base limit but would violate the aggregate limit. The fec announced this anprm to reassess regulations implicated by the decision in. The fec published a notice following the mccutcheon decision and asked whether the commission can or should change its joint fundraising rules to avoid the formation of super jfcs. Jul 23 20, set for argument on tuesday, october 8, 20. The case involved whether congress had the right to limit the total amount of donations an individual can make, at the federal level, in an election cycle. On october 9, 2014, the commission approved both an interim final rule and an advance notice of proposed rulemaking anprm to revise the commissions regulations to reflect the supreme courts decision in mccutcheon v. See aggregate biennial contribution limits, 79 fr 62335 oct. Federal election commission, defendant on certification of constitutional questions. In january 2008 six months after the supreme court issued its decision in wisconsin right to life the government accountability board opened its doors as the new regulatory agency responsible for administering wisconsin election law, taking over.
In defense of mccutcheon v federal election commission by. On april 2, 2014, the supreme court issued a ruling in mccutcheon v. Federal election commission appeal from the united states district court for the district of columbia no. January 20, 2016 secretary 100 f street, ne file no.
With the courts decision in mccutcheon, wealthy donors may now. The commission is taking this action in light of the supreme courts recent decision in mccutcheon v. Mar 11 20 motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by appellants shaun mccutcheon, et al. Election commn is a landmark decision along with the case four years earlier of citizens united v. Roberts court campaign finance decisions containing shades of that doctrine. Supreme court ruled in 2010 that political spending is a form of free speech thats protected under the first amendment. In 2014, the supreme court issued another 54 decision in the case of mccutcheon v. United states district court for the district of columbia. Shaun mccutcheon is an alabama resident who is eligible to vote. Fec decision fundamentally changes how people and corporations, thanks to citizens united can fund campaigns, opening the floodgates for millions of dollars in new spending, which had been curtailed by campaign finance laws going back to the early 1970s.
Our ruling anticipated the supreme courts recent decision in mccutcheon v. United states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit argued november 30, 2018 decided may 21, 2019 no. In defense of mccutcheon v federal election commission. Because the increased candidate contributions permitted by. Jul 18 20, brief of appellee federal election commission filed. Did anyone else notice that the gops mudball, the drudge report, had absolutely nothing to say about the mccutcheon decision.
The fec seeks comments on whether any regulatory changes are necessary in light of the decision. The panels failure to recognize this stems from a misunderstanding of what the supreme court meant by quid pro quo corruption in buckley v. The united states supreme court held 54 that freedom of speech prohibited the government from restricting independent political. Comments must be received on or before january 15, 2015. Fec, which held that the aggregate contribution limits are unconstitutional. Federal election commission on appeal from the united states district court for the district of columbia april 2, 2014 justice thomas, concurring in the judgment. Within 30 days of the date of the supreme courts disposition of mccutcheon, appellants and appellee are directed to file supplemental briefs not to exceed 20 pages, addressing the effect of the supreme courts decision in mccutcheon on this case. In addition to addressing disclosure, the committee has invited testimony on the courts recent decision in mccutcheon v. In the 20112012 election cycle, he donated to the republican national committee, other republican committees, as well as individual candidates.
I adhere to the view that this courts decision in buckley v. A history of campaign finance reform from george washington to shaun mccutcheon by jaime fuller, april 3, 2014 yesterday, the supreme court decided to eliminate limits on aggregate campaign contributions in the case mccutcheon v. United states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit argued january 10, 2020 decided march, 2020 no. Use the pdf linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format. Letter to fec assistant general counsel amy rothstein, re.
Supreme court declared aggregate campaign limits unconstitutional. United states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit argued en banc september 30, 2014 decided july 7, 2015 no. Federal election commission, appellee on certification of constitutional questions from the united states district court for the district of columbia no. Supreme court on april 2, 2014, struck down 54 provisions of the federal election campaign act feca. Supreme court of the united states syllabus citizens united v. Election commission represented the most important election law decision since citizens united v. Argued march 24, 2009reargued september 9, 2009 decided january 21, 2010. Fec that struck down the aggregate limits on the amount an individual may contribute during a twoyear period to all federal candidates, parties and political action committees combined. District court for the district of columbia aligned its judgment in james v. The contribution serves as a general expression of support for the candidate and his views and serves to affiliate a person with. Mccutcheon, which struck down aggregate contribution limits in the federal election campaign act, reiterated the importance of associational rights, and further recognized that those. The courts decision in mccutcheon v fec rested on the assumption that the aggregate contribution limits were not necessary to prevent circumvention of base contribution limits because effective anticircumvention measures would be enforced. After graduating from the georgia institute of technology.
1159 184 1200 397 92 1028 1098 468 1069 886 14 1371 795 1568 1006 1082 1595 1294 1640 91 572 57 1558 1649 1142 955 150 1347 1062 1363 421 297 1458 307 1206 1214 799 190 1495 913 263